Archive for the ‘web accessibility’ Category

Test drive

May 6, 2008

Announcement: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group announced the publication of WCAG 2.0 as a W3C Candidate Recommendation.

Translation: Very smart people updated guidelines on how to make Web sites, application, and other content accessible to people with disabilities and many elderly users.

The Working Group wants developers and designers to test the WCAG 2.0 and share their implementation experience.

WCAG 2.0

WCAG 2.0 Candidate Recommendation Implementation Information

If you want to give the new guidelines a whirl, let them know by May 23, 2008. Actual implementation is due June 30, 2008.

We have the technology

May 4, 2008

I did a little deeper research after the last post, and found that there seems to be more of a story than I originally thought with Rite Aid.

In 2000 the National Federation for the Blind, its D.C. affiliate, and several blind individuals sued Chevy Chase Bank, Rite Aid Corp. and Diebold over ATM accessibility issues.

According to the Americans with Disabilities Act, “instructions and all information for use be made accessible to, and independently usable by, persons with vision impairments.” The suit argued that while some of the defendants’ ATMs had Braille keypads and labels, the Braille was an “ineffective accommodation.”

Not all persons who are blind can read Braille,” explains Dr. Maurer, president of the National Federation for the Blind.

“Moreover, Braille keypads and labels are static. They do not provide accessible and independently usable, sequential, computer screen instructions to guide a blind customer through a bank transaction. As a result blind customers basically have little choice but to rely on others to do their banking for them.”

According to the NFB, the only effective means to make ATMs accessible to the blind is voice-guidance technology, which allows blind persons to hear step-by-step instructions. Voice-guidance technology is accessed by plugging personal headphones into a universal audio jack installed in the ATM or by using a telephone handset, also installed in the ATM.

The NFB has long been actively involved in promoting adaptive technologies for the blind so that blind people can live and work independently in today’s technology-dependent world.

Click after the jump for the full text of the press release from NFB and an article about the case from ATMMagazine.com. As a side note, if you click on the link on the headline of the press release, it will take you to the source on NFB’s Web site. This is an outstanding page for the visually impaired. No navigation links, no complicated HTML, nothing that can trip up a screen reader. Just plain text. (more…)

Candidates on Disabilities

April 28, 2008

As election season continues to drag on the democratic candidates are getting scrutinized on everything from economic plans to bowling. A hot topic on the campaign trail has been healthcare plans. Much ado has been made over universal healthcare versus employer-sponsored packages and on and on. However, I have heard little about the candidates’ policies on disabilities. Crookedtimber.org has a post breaking down the candidates positions.

OK, so go to Hillary’s web page, click on “Issues,” choose “Providing Affordable and Accessible Health Care,” then go over to the right sidebar – the one headed “Hillary’s Plans,” and go down to the subheading, “How Hillary’s plan affects:” and then click on “Americans with Disabilities.” You’ll get a .pdf that reads, in part:

Employer-sponsored health care can present significant cost and coverage concerns for both employers and people with disabilities. Some insurance plans cap payments for durable medical equipment, which includes items such as wheelchairs, crutches, braces, and ventilators; in effect, making coverage for those items unavailable. The American Health Choices Plan prohibits insurance companies from denying coverage to limiting coverage for pre-existing conditions. In addition, insurers will be prohibited from charging significantly higher premiums based on medical conditions, age, gender, or occupation.

This is good stuff, though it painfully exposes the problem of relying on employer-sponsored health care in the first place – and doesn’t mention the fact that the unemployment rate for people with disabilities is . . . well, exceptionally difficult to determine, but quite high. But then, there’s another problem here, and throughout Clinton’s website: because (as is so often the case), there’s no separate heading for policies affecting people with disabilities, you have to look around under other issues – in this case, health care – to see if disability is mentioned.

Obama, by contrast, has a separate heading titled “Disabilities.” This in itself is remarkable; but it turns out that this isn’t just a matter of better web design. Whoever is advising Obama on disability policy is really, really smart. The nine-page .pdf, “Barack Obama’s Plan to Empower Americans with Disabilities”, says many of the same things Hillary does – about supporting full funding for IDEA, providing health coverage for the most vulnerable among us, and hiring 100,000 people with disabilities in the federal government (except that someone needs to tell the Obama camp that it’s Executive Order 13163 Obama needs to reinstate, not 13173, which created an Interagency Task Force on the Economic Development of the Central San Joaquin Valley; reinstating 13173, whatever its merits, probably won’t do much for disability policy in the United States). But the plan is, remarkably enough, at once broader and more specific than Clinton’s.

For Web accessibility purposes, I like how he directs you to exactly where you need to click through to find the policies that he’s referring to.

It’s lengthy, but a useful post for anyone interested in the election and those concerned about healthcare for people with disabilities and handicaps. The comment section is worth taking a look at as well, as the commenters bounce ideas off one another and provide direction to more material on the subject.

BBC on accessibility

April 28, 2008

Here’s a neat Youtube video from BBC about Web accessibility for the visually impaired. It has some interesting commentary on a study that determined that Web sites that adhere to accessibility standards are 34 percent easier for everyone to use. I had a little bit of an issue with the reporter talking about “the rest of us,” but the content was still good.

Around 4:10 there’s a discussion on the uses of Flash and CSS. I’ve never really been a fan of Flash when I use Web sites. I can’t stand things flying around willy-nilly without my control. But I think I’m going to have to do some research on the capabilities of Flash and CSS for accessibility

Legalities

April 27, 2008

When it comes to the physical operation of running a business, there aren’t many ways to get around handicapped or disability compliance. You must have a ramp on your sidewalk. There must be an elevator to get to the upper or lower levels. You have to offer interpreter services. You cannot discriminate in your hiring practices. Thanks to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,

no individual may be discriminated against on the basis of disability with regards to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.

However, Web sites do not fall under the classification of “public accomodation” and principles of Web accessibility may be applied at the discretion of the site owner. There is a push for legislation to make accessible Web design mandatory,  but there are difficulties. There are so many factors and different requirements to take into consideration that it seems impossible to be inclusive to everyone.

Since the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990, more legislation has been passed to help Web designers accommodate accessible technology.

“The Assistive Technology Act of 1998″ includes provisions for the development, funding, and availability of assistive technologies, and the dissemination of information regarding these technologies. This act is important to Web developers because the potential for an increase in end users who are accessing Web-based materials using assistive technologies means an increased need for accessible Web design (and the increased opportunity for Web architects to incorporate the principles of accessible Web design). Source: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology Syracuse NY

More information about legislation for people with handicaps and disabilities can be found at:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Assistive Technology Act of 1998

Telecommunications Act